<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smarterware &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smarterware.org/category/wetware/philosophy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smarterware.org</link>
	<description>A blog about software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We Need Women Leaders; Here&#8217;s How to Get Them</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/7358/we-need-women-leaders-heres-how-to-get-them</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/7358/we-need-women-leaders-heres-how-to-get-them#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire Boonstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TED]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=7358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg describes the dearth of women in high-level leadership positions in corporations, non-profits and government, and offers three pieces of advice on how to keep women in the workplace, help them rise to the top, and change those numbers. Her awesome TED talk is a must-see for parents, college students, and women [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook COO <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheryl_Sandberg">Sheryl Sandberg</a> describes the dearth of women in high-level leadership positions in corporations, non-profits and government, and offers three pieces of advice on how to keep women in the workplace, help them rise to the top, and change those numbers. Her awesome TED talk is a must-see for parents, college students, and women already at work. It's only 15 minutes&mdash;watch it.</p>
<p><object width="446" height="326"><param name="movie" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff"></param><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/SherylSandberg_2010W-medium.flv&#038;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/SherylSandberg-2010W.embed_thumbnail.jpg&#038;vw=432&#038;vh=240&#038;ap=0&#038;ti=1040&#038;introDuration=15330&#038;adDuration=4000&#038;postAdDuration=830&#038;adKeys=talk=sheryl_sandberg_why_we_have_too_few_women_leaders;year=2010;theme=new_on_ted_com;theme=not_business_as_usual;theme=celebrating_tedwomen;event=TEDWomen;&#038;preAdTag=tconf.ted/embed;tile=1;sz=512x288;" /><embed src="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" pluginspace="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" bgColor="#ffffff" width="446" height="326" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" flashvars="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/SherylSandberg_2010W-medium.flv&#038;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/SherylSandberg-2010W.embed_thumbnail.jpg&#038;vw=432&#038;vh=240&#038;ap=0&#038;ti=1040&#038;introDuration=15330&#038;adDuration=4000&#038;postAdDuration=830&#038;adKeys=talk=sheryl_sandberg_why_we_have_too_few_women_leaders;year=2010;theme=new_on_ted_com;theme=not_business_as_usual;theme=celebrating_tedwomen;event=TEDWomen;"></embed></object></p>
<p>Increasing female leadership isn't just about evening out the numbers or equal rights. Layar co-founder Claire Boonstra argues competitive companies and sustainable governments today <i>demand</i> it. She <a href="http://site.layar.com/company/blog/layar%E2%80%99s-claire-boonstra-reflects-on-the-world-economic-forum-in-davos-moving-towards-the-new-reality/">writes</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-7358"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>To my (and Layar’s) opinion, modern leadership has a lot of feminine elements. It is not so much about power, control, top-down thinking and ego, but much more about inclusiveness, intuition, the will to move ahead, looking for win-win (for both parties) rather than ‘I win, you lose’. Today’s society is changing and moving so quickly – top-down thinking and leadership based purely on ratio is not sustainable. Organizations sticking to old principles and old styles of leadership will simply be bypassed by fast movers and disruptors.</p></blockquote>
<p>Finally, on a lighter, <i>Mad Men</i> style note, <a href="http://thisrecording.com/today/2011/2/22/in-which-we-teach-you-how-to-be-a-woman-in-any-boys-club.html">This Recording's hilarious essay written for women trying to make it in a boys' club</a> rang all sorts of bells for me. There are so many quotes worth pulling here, but let's go with this one, which dovetails nicely with Sandberg's "Sit at the table" bit:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Drive It Like You Stole It.</b> Be the best. That is, assuming that you are the best. Be the best you can possibly be, whatever that means to you. Absolutely do not step down in order to not threaten people. Don't apologize. If you genuinely f*cked up fine, you are allowed to apologize once but then stop apologizing. Think about how much you hear women apologizing for themselves for no reason, or being self-deprecating or self-abnegating out of habit. What the f*ck are you apologizing for? For being too good?</p></blockquote>
<p>(Thanks, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/amygdala/status/40126411016507392">Amy</a>.)</p>
<p>I don't often discuss being a woman in technology; I'd rather just <a href="http://smarterware.org/5592/celebrate-ada-lovelace-day-by-coding-something-meaningful">do something good</a> and let that speak for itself. But when successful women have great advice for other women, it's criminal not to share it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/7358/we-need-women-leaders-heres-how-to-get-them/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Wasn&#8217;t I Consulted?</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/7100/why-wasnt-i-consulted</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/7100/why-wasnt-i-consulted#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web Way]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=7100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ford's fabulous essay, The Web Is a Customer Service Medium, on the fundamental question of the web: "Create a service experience around what you publish and sell. Whatever 'customer service' means when it comes to books and authors, figure it out and do it. Do it in partnership with your readers. Turn your readers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Ford's fabulous essay, <a href="http://www.ftrain.com/wwic.html">The Web Is a Customer Service Medium</a>, on the fundamental question of the web: "Create a service experience around what you publish and sell. Whatever 'customer service' means when it comes to books and authors, figure it out and do it. Do it in partnership with your readers. Turn your readers into members. Not visitors, not subscribers; you want members. And then don't just consult them, but give them tools to consult amongst themselves. These things are cheap and easy now if you hire one or two smart people instead of a large consultancy. Define what the boundaries are in your community and punish transgressors without fear of losing a sale. Then, if your product is good, you'll sell things."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/7100/why-wasnt-i-consulted/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Lessons Learned</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/7061/2010-lessons-learned</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/7061/2010-lessons-learned#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Years resolutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=7061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lose weight. Save money. Start exercising. Rather than make arbitrary and predictable New Year's resolutions this January 1st, it can be more useful to look back at 2010, think about what lessons you learned from real-world experiences, and resolve to take those with you into 2011. I loved how Felicia Day did this in her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://smarterware.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/MVI_8405-1-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="Grandpa and the puppy" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7081" align="right" />Lose weight. Save money. Start exercising. Rather than make arbitrary and predictable New Year's resolutions this January 1st, it can be more useful to look back at 2010, think about what lessons you learned from real-world experiences, and resolve to take those with you into 2011. I loved how Felicia Day did this in her year-end blog post, <a href="http://feliciaday.com/blog/five-things-about-2010">Five Things of 2010</a>. (Read it: #2 and #5 especially spoke to me.) Posts like that make me truly miss personal blogging, and inspire me to do more of it&mdash;so that's exactly what I'm going to do here. </p>
<p>2010 was a great year for me and my family, and there are a few things I will take away from the last 12 months as we all start in on 2011. In no particular order:</p>
<p><span id="more-7061"></span></p>
<p><strong>Doing the right thing now pays back later.</strong> In 2010 I got to reap the benefits of decisions made years ago, financially, professionally, and personally. Grandpa is the best example I have for this one.</p>
<p>Five years ago when we moved to San Diego, where my wife's 90-year-old grandfather lived, she said to me, "I feel bad that I haven't had a close relationship with Grandpa, so I'd like to spend more time with him and help him out." After that, every Sunday when his regular caregiver was off, we went to his home to visit, eat a meal, watch 60 Minutes, and help him take care of his wife who was suffering stage 7 Alzheimer's. Sometimes the visits involved serious unpleasantries, like changing adult diapers and cleaning up after Grandpa's dogs. (His sense of smell was pretty dull at that point, so the dogs would have left all sorts of "gifts" around the house by the time we arrived.)  I'll admit it: there were a LOT of Sundays I dreaded the visit. I would have much rather stayed home than sit with a 90-year-old for hours. </p>
<p>Grandpa passed away this past January at 95 years old. It was terrible losing him. But in retrospect, that time we decided to make for him each Sunday was so precious and important. When he died we were at peace knowing that we got to know him and support him during his last and most difficult years on this earth.</p>
<p>That's probably the biggest "I'm so glad we did that" lesson learned in 2010, but all year there were unexpected people, projects, and revelations that grew out of earlier work and interactions. Doing the right thing matters, more than you realize in the moment when you'd really rather not. I'm going to remember that every time I grumble about doing the right thing when it feels like an inconvenience in 2011.</p>
<p><strong>Don't waste your time on stuff that doesn't matter.</strong> I learn and re-learn this lesson every single year, and I swear the universe will continue to flog me about the head and shoulders with it till I get it right. In 2010 I spent time on more than a few things for the wrong reasons: because I thought I "should," because of the money, because I was being polite, because I was worried about what other people thought of me. In 2011 I will not spend time on meaningless projects, email, meetings, contracts, speaking gigs, chats, or, dare I say it, reality television.</p>
<p><strong>Surround yourself with people who are more skilled than you are.</strong> My racquetball coach always told me the only way to get better at the game was to "play up", or play opponents who are better than you. It's humiliating getting your ass handed to you by someone who is more skilled both on the racquetball court and off, but it's also the easiest way to see shots you didn't imagine were possible and expect more of yourself. This year I did a LOT of playing up. Leo Laporte, Jeff Jarvis, Anil Dash, Andy Baio, and Mark Wilkie are all co-workers of mine who are way more skilled than I am at their craft, not to mention my wife, who shows me every day how to be a better human. I never want to be the "star" in my group of associates; I always want to be surrounded by stars who outshine me, humble me, and help me aspire to be better than I am.</p>
<p><strong>Set yourself up for unexpected success.</strong> Sometimes things just don't turn out the way you expect. In 2010, I wrote a book about <a href="http://wave.googele.com">a product</a> which essentially <a href="http://smarterware.org/6499/on-google-wave-and-failed-experiments">got killed</a>. That really sucked. In the process I got to try a whole new method of book publishing, and that platform helped someone else publish <a href="http://completeandroidguide.com/">another book about a product which is thriving</a>. That's really fantastic.</p>
<p>In 2009, I started to build an <a href="http://smarterware.org/2877/twitalytic-alpha-preview-archiving-curating-and-threading-tweets">open-source webapp for my own use</a>, with zero plans for it. In 2010, that project <a href="http://smarterware.org/5187/thinktank-is-now-at-expert-labs">became my full-time dream job</a>. Sometimes success doesn't happen the way you expect it to, but if you just <i>do stuff you feel inspired to do</i>, you set yourself up for good things to happen. </p>
<p>One thing that I often feel inspired to do but don't make the time to do it is write more from the heart on this site. I resolve to do more of that in 2011.  </p>
<p>Happy New Year, and thanks for reading. What are you taking away from your 2010?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/7061/2010-lessons-learned/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fork Me</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/6691/fork-me</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/6691/fork-me#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anil Dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Git]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GitHub]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=6691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anil publishes a great post on git, GitHub, and the culture of forking. I take partial credit for it, only because I showed Anil how to make his first commits in git.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anil publishes a great post on <a href="http://dashes.com/anil/2010/09/forking-is-a-feature.html">git, GitHub, and the culture of forking</a>. I take partial credit for it, only because I showed Anil how to make <a href="http://github.com/ginatrapani/ThinkUp/commits/master?author=anildash">his first commits in git</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/6691/fork-me/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing the Feedback Loop</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5168/closing-the-feedback-loop</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/5168/closing-the-feedback-loop#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Haughey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Haughey says Google Buzz doesn't offer an easy way for publishers to see what people are saying about their stuff. He's right; as in Google Reader and Facebook, much of the liking and commenting and sharing that goes on in Buzz happens out of earshot of the creator. I think Buzz is a fine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://a.wholelottanothing.org/2010/02/broken-feedback-loops.html">Matt Haughey says Google Buzz doesn't offer an easy way for publishers to see what people are saying about their stuff</a>. He's right; as in Google Reader and Facebook, much of the liking and commenting and sharing that goes on in Buzz happens out of earshot of the creator. I think Buzz is a fine product--a pretty predictable FriendFeed clone, really--but it does suffer from this same broken loop problem that Google Reader creates. Also of interest to other publishers, Matt's related piece on <a href="http://a.wholelottanothing.org/2010/02/my-personal-feedback-loops.html">what feedback loops he pays attention to</a> in order to learn how to make better stuff online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/5168/closing-the-feedback-loop/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers Don&#8217;t Tinker Because They Got Invited</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/4941/hackers-dont-tinker-because-they-got-invited</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/4941/hackers-dont-tinker-because-they-got-invited#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=4941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Pilgrim's excellent exposition on the "tinkerer's sunset" (an idea Alex Payne put forth in his iPad piece I linked earlier) got me thinking about the nature of tinkerers, and whether the iPad really represents a sunset for them. The optimist in me thinks it couldn't even if it tried. First, know that I fundamentally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Pilgrim's excellent <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2010/01/29/tinkerers-sunset">exposition on the "tinkerer's sunset"</a> (an idea <a href="http://al3x.net/2010/01/28/ipad.html">Alex Payne put forth in his iPad piece</a> I linked earlier) got me thinking about the nature of tinkerers, and whether the iPad <i>really</i> represents a sunset for them. The optimist in me thinks it couldn't even if it tried.</p>
<p>First, know that I fundamentally agree with Alex and Mark: the closed nature of the iPad turns me off, and I wouldn't give one to my kid if I were encouraging her to learn about how computers work. But, Apple's rightly betting that most people don't want to know about the inner workings of a computer,* and regardless of the fact that Apple runs the App Store with an iron fist, dedicated hackers have still figured out <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jailbreak_%28iPhone_OS%29">ways</a> to run whatever software they want on the iPhone/iPod touch. They'll do the same with the iPad, and this led me to <a href="http://twitter.com/ginatrapani/status/8370391224">muse</a> that the open versus closed debate, which has geeks like me in a tizzy, may be 99% a philosophical discussion. Because while we're all ranting about how closed the iPad will be, the jailbreak community is planning competitions to see who can crack it first. The sun isn't setting on tinkerers; their desire to crack things open intensifies when faced with something that's closed by design. The challenge is part of the appeal.</p>
<p><span id="more-4941"></span></p>
<p>I wrote Mark an email about all this earlier and realized I should have just posted it publicly. Here's a quick copy and paste job, with a few edits for readability.</p>
<blockquote><p>Doesn't tinkering, by definition, connote cracking something open, voiding the warranty, and twiddling regardless of consequences? Taking the risk that you brick it with no recourse? When you jailbreak your iPhone, is there a *practical* difference between that experience and rooting Android, or flashing your Linksys with open source firmware, or installing XBMC on your Xbox? Is the legality the difference? Which of those activities is legal and which is illegal? (I'm not even sure, which is pretty ignorant on my part, since I've done all of those. I just didn't care.) Is there really a tinkerer's sunset if unlocking the iWhatever in some manner remains an option? If it's not an option, won't the act of tinkering involve MAKING it one? I'm of the mind that if someone wants to tinker, they will tinker, period. Because it's in their DNA, not because it's easy, and because by nature, tinkerers don't play by the rules.</p>
<p>I think that's where I'm least comfortable with the doom-and-gloom tinkerer's sunset vision of the future. I have a LOT of faith that our future tinkerers won't give a crap about the law and crack stuff they find interesting open, regardless, and they'll figure out how to do it, even if it takes more than typing Ctrl+Reset. Most of the stuff we all hack on is closed in some way, isn't it? Not that this is an excuse for Apple's stupidity... more of an observation.</p>
<p>So, I asked about the open v. closed thing being mostly philosophical because the jailbreak community is alive and well. Even though on one hand I'm chagrined they're spending time and energy developing for a platform that shuns them, on the other, the fact that they exist supports my optimistic outlook about the unflagging dedication of the tinkerer, especially to doing things they're told not to do. (For better or for worse, optimism is my default setting.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Even though I am critical of the iPad's closed nature and agree with Mark and Alex, I won't go as far as Alex did and say that it represents a dystopian future. I have more faith in our future tinkerers than that. </p>
<p>That all said, I personally will spend my time developing for open systems.</p>
<p>* Regarding Apple's goal of abstracting away the inner workings of a computer into a device that "just works" by "magic," Gruber's <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/various_ipad_thoughts">automatic versus manual transmission metaphor</a> is a particularly good one. I don't know how to drive a stick, but it's literally been on my "things I want to learn" list since I got my license. I'm not a car enthusiast. I just love driving, and a stick shift seems like it would be something I'd really enjoy. Take from that what you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/4941/hackers-dont-tinker-because-they-got-invited/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Word About Women in Technology</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/4790/a-word-about-women-in-technology</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/4790/a-word-about-women-in-technology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=4790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get asked a lot about being a woman in technology and its various niches--social media, open source, entrepreneurship, blogging. Interviewers want to know whether or not things are getting better for women, why there aren't more women here or there, what women should or shouldn't be doing, and what the future holds for those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get asked a lot about being a woman in technology and its various niches--social media, open source, entrepreneurship, blogging. Interviewers want to know whether or not things are getting better for women, why there aren't more women here or there, what women should or shouldn't be doing, and what the future holds for those of us in tech who happen to have the XX chromosome. When I get these questions, I never know what to say. Being a woman doesn't make me an expert on gender. I can only draw from my own subjective experiences during what's been a very charmed career. But folks keep asking. So, here's my official line on the topic, which I sent off to an interviewer just this week.</p>
<p><span id="more-4790"></span></p>
<p>In both offline and online life, women are more visible, respected, and accomplished than they've ever been before. At the risk of sounding like a Pollyanna, I believe now is a golden time for women in technology, a time when an awareness of the need for diversity in our field is at its highest. Conference organizers, editors, journalists, and CTOs are desperate to get knowledgeable women onto their speaker rosters, mastheads, source lists, and staff. (I know, because they ask me!) There are many opportunities for those of us who don't look like Bill Gates, but it's up to us to make ourselves visible, eligible, and take them. </p>
<p>Ladies, now is not the time for timidity. Step up, take chances, push yourself beyond your comfort zone, use your powers and influence for good, and let your expertise shine. There's plenty of room for improvement, but we'll only get there if you do your work, do it well, and do it where others can see and appreciate your example.</p>
<p>That is all. Now, speaking of work: back to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/4790/a-word-about-women-in-technology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December Always Gets Me Reflecting</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/4182/december-always-makes-me-get-reflective</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/4182/december-always-makes-me-get-reflective#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bylines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=4182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a little failure in every success, and a little success in every failure. 'Tis the season to take stock.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a little failure in every success, and a little success in every failure. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5432965/tis-the-season-to-take-stock">'Tis the season to take stock</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/4182/december-always-makes-me-get-reflective/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should You or Shouldn&#8217;t You Host Your Own Webapps</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3287/should-you-or-shouldnt-you-host-your-own-webapps</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/3287/should-you-or-shouldnt-you-host-your-own-webapps#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webapps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the smartest people I've ever met, Maciej Cegłowski, says you shouldn't self-host web-based software like WordPress or Fever or eventually, Google Wave, because it requires you to "devote half your life to learning and understanding [server] administration." Go with a hosted service or generate flat HTML files of your blog posts that you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the smartest people I've ever met, <a href="http://idlewords.com/about.htm">Maciej Cegłowski</a>, says you shouldn't self-host web-based software like <a href="http://wordpress.org">WordPress</a> or <a href="http://feedafever.com/">Fever</a> or eventually, <a href="http://wave.google.com">Google Wave</a>, because it requires you to "<a href="http://www.idlewords.com/2009/09/how_to_not_get_your_blog_hacked.htm">devote half your life to learning and understanding [server] administration</a>." Go with a hosted service or <a href="http://www.idlewords.com/2009/09/using_wordpress_to_generate_flat_files.htm">generate flat HTML files of your blog posts</a> that you upload to your server automatically instead, he says. While Maciej's argument may apply to some (ok, most?) folks, I disagree: When it comes to a project you care passionately about, doing it yourself is much more educational and satisfying (and won't take half your life). Sure, most people should just buy instead of build, but they'll never get something that's exactly what they want and unlike any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/3287/should-you-or-shouldnt-you-host-your-own-webapps/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debunking the Lone Genius Myth</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/2639/debunking-the-lone-genius-myth</link>
		<comments>http://smarterware.org/2639/debunking-the-lone-genius-myth#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSCON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=2639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During their session at OSCON, Google programmers Ben Collins-Sussman and Brian Fitzpatrick say that it's coders who can collaborate with others, not lone ranger geniuses, who are best at what they do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/07/oscon-programmer-insecurity-an.html">During their session at OSCON</a>, Google programmers Ben Collins-Sussman and Brian Fitzpatrick say that it's coders who can collaborate with others, not lone ranger geniuses, who are best at what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smarterware.org/2639/debunking-the-lone-genius-myth/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

