<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail Tip: Selectively Auto-Reply with a Canned Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smarterware.org/987/gmail-tip-selectively-auto-reply-with-a-canned-response/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smarterware.org/987/gmail-tip-selectively-auto-reply-with-a-canned-response</link>
	<description>A blog about software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debashish Chakrabarty</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/987/gmail-tip-selectively-auto-reply-with-a-canned-response#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Debashish Chakrabarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=987#comment-352</guid>
		<description>The more I tell them to unsubscribe the more they send me those emails. The best option is to apply a filter to send them to the place they deserve to be, the trash-can :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I tell them to unsubscribe the more they send me those emails. The best option is to apply a filter to send them to the place they deserve to be, the trash-can <img src='http://smarterware.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Trapani</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/987/gmail-tip-selectively-auto-reply-with-a-canned-response#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=987#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Oh wow, I didn&#039;t even realize that Canned responses gave you away like that!  I always start every canned response with &quot;sorry for the impersonal reply, but&quot; to cover my bases (and not sound like a bot), but I can see how this could be trouble.  Buyer beware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow, I didn&#8217;t even realize that Canned responses gave you away like that!  I always start every canned response with &#8220;sorry for the impersonal reply, but&#8221; to cover my bases (and not sound like a bot), but I can see how this could be trouble.  Buyer beware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astallings</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/987/gmail-tip-selectively-auto-reply-with-a-canned-response#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>astallings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=987#comment-350</guid>
		<description>I LOVE the canned response auto-reply with one exception ... it amends your return address to read username+canned.response@gmail.com. 

I&#039;m not sure why gmail feels the need to expose the canned-ness of the response in your reply-to address, it seems unnecessary and almost a little rude. Even auto.response@gmail.com would be a little gentler. Granted, in the case of your PR flacks, you don&#039;t care if they know it&#039;s canned ... but I use my auto-responders to deal with frequent inquiries that I care about, and the reply-to address gives me away every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE the canned response auto-reply with one exception &#8230; it amends your return address to read <a href="mailto:username+canned.response@gmail.com">username+canned.response@gmail.com</a>. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why gmail feels the need to expose the canned-ness of the response in your reply-to address, it seems unnecessary and almost a little rude. Even <a href="mailto:auto.response@gmail.com">auto.response@gmail.com</a> would be a little gentler. Granted, in the case of your PR flacks, you don&#8217;t care if they know it&#8217;s canned &#8230; but I use my auto-responders to deal with frequent inquiries that I care about, and the reply-to address gives me away every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

