<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Buzz: Gmail&#8217;s New Social Network Activity Aggregator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator</link>
	<description>A blog about software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandi</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>chandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>I think Buzz, on itself wouldn&#039;t be a deal-breaker! when it is combined with all the Google Apps. It kinda makes the Ecosystem (chat+Mail+docs+Wave+Buzz) for Enterprise Users self-sustainable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Buzz, on itself wouldn&#8217;t be a deal-breaker! when it is combined with all the Google Apps. It kinda makes the Ecosystem (chat+Mail+docs+Wave+Buzz) for Enterprise Users self-sustainable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRGlennon</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator>MRGlennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1841</guid>
		<description>Oh yea, one more thing.

Reader allows you to select someone and see their Shares.  This allows you to focus on people you like seeing shares from more than people you don&#039;t care about as much (like if you&#039;re in a time crunch)

This Buzz River of information approach doesn&#039;t make it easy to select who you want to read.  To me it looks like a priority is being placed on WHEN over WHO

Will Buzz ever be like Reader where we can see if the people we care about the most have updated without having to go through an entire wall to notice? 

Or maybe I&#039;m just not sure how to filter Buzz yet.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yea, one more thing.</p>
<p>Reader allows you to select someone and see their Shares.  This allows you to focus on people you like seeing shares from more than people you don&#8217;t care about as much (like if you&#8217;re in a time crunch)</p>
<p>This Buzz River of information approach doesn&#8217;t make it easy to select who you want to read.  To me it looks like a priority is being placed on WHEN over WHO</p>
<p>Will Buzz ever be like Reader where we can see if the people we care about the most have updated without having to go through an entire wall to notice? </p>
<p>Or maybe I&#8217;m just not sure how to filter Buzz yet.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRGlennon</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1840</link>
		<dc:creator>MRGlennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1840</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m snowed in so I&#039;ve been playing with it all day. I think this is going to be a great thing, but it&#039;s far from perfect.

I&#039;m a huge Google Reader fan.  I have 50 people that I follow and we are all connected to each other and very active on the sharing and commenting section of that site.  

A big dowside to Buzz is that while comments posted on shares in Reader show up in Buzz (and vice versa), Buzz isn&#039;t set up to mark items &quot;as Read&quot; like they get marked as &quot;Read&quot; in Reader after you read them.  This is because like Facebook&#039;s newsfeed, they don&#039;t want posts to go away or out of view like a &quot;read&quot; item does in Reader.  They want it to be this constantly flowing river of information arranged by the date of when it is posted.  Nothing ever goes away.  It becomes part of this long running permanent record.

My Reader friends and I are intrigued by Buzz, but don&#039;t really know what to do with it.  So far for us it&#039;s meant a lot of seeing the same Shares twice.

And I&#039;m not an expert in Twitter, but it&#039;s not like you can yet connect your Twitter account in such a way that all the people you follow on Twitter will have their tweets start rolling into your Buzz.  Right? I mean, I can choose to share my Tweets in Buzz and anyone that has linked up both their Twitter and their Buzz will appear in my Buzz when they tweet, but won&#039;t that leave out a big group of people (like the celebrities that are fun to follow)

Gina, big fan, and I would love to hear you talk about this on TWiG.  Thanks, 
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m snowed in so I&#8217;ve been playing with it all day. I think this is going to be a great thing, but it&#8217;s far from perfect.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a huge Google Reader fan.  I have 50 people that I follow and we are all connected to each other and very active on the sharing and commenting section of that site.  </p>
<p>A big dowside to Buzz is that while comments posted on shares in Reader show up in Buzz (and vice versa), Buzz isn&#8217;t set up to mark items &#8220;as Read&#8221; like they get marked as &#8220;Read&#8221; in Reader after you read them.  This is because like Facebook&#8217;s newsfeed, they don&#8217;t want posts to go away or out of view like a &#8220;read&#8221; item does in Reader.  They want it to be this constantly flowing river of information arranged by the date of when it is posted.  Nothing ever goes away.  It becomes part of this long running permanent record.</p>
<p>My Reader friends and I are intrigued by Buzz, but don&#8217;t really know what to do with it.  So far for us it&#8217;s meant a lot of seeing the same Shares twice.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not an expert in Twitter, but it&#8217;s not like you can yet connect your Twitter account in such a way that all the people you follow on Twitter will have their tweets start rolling into your Buzz.  Right? I mean, I can choose to share my Tweets in Buzz and anyone that has linked up both their Twitter and their Buzz will appear in my Buzz when they tweet, but won&#8217;t that leave out a big group of people (like the celebrities that are fun to follow)</p>
<p>Gina, big fan, and I would love to hear you talk about this on TWiG.  Thanks,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Parmely</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Parmely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>This piques my interest because it allows you to aggregate your social networking feeds into one location and uses existing infrastructure to help you do it. The downside of it is that for full functionality, you want your buddies to have access to Buzz as well, and not everyone uses Gmail.

Now, I&#039;ll be even more impressed if they have native Twitter (2-way) and Facebook integration in the pipe so you can publish content as well. 

I&#039;m still trying to iron out practical applications for it, but it could be a great way to keep me in Gmail where I live most of the time anyway, and out of 6 other tabs worth of feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piques my interest because it allows you to aggregate your social networking feeds into one location and uses existing infrastructure to help you do it. The downside of it is that for full functionality, you want your buddies to have access to Buzz as well, and not everyone uses Gmail.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;ll be even more impressed if they have native Twitter (2-way) and Facebook integration in the pipe so you can publish content as well. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still trying to iron out practical applications for it, but it could be a great way to keep me in Gmail where I live most of the time anyway, and out of 6 other tabs worth of feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Pascoal</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Pascoal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t figure out why Buzz wasn&#039;t working with my Google Apps Account then I found this article:

http://digg.com/tech_news/Buzz_Reveals_Google_s_Split_Personality

I&#039;ve noticed this problem before with other Google services like Picasa.

Basically Google pretends they don&#039;t know who you are and forces you to open a regular gmail account?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t figure out why Buzz wasn&#8217;t working with my Google Apps Account then I found this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Buzz_Reveals_Google_s_Split_Personality" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tech_news/Buzz_Reveals_Google_s_Split_Personality</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed this problem before with other Google services like Picasa.</p>
<p>Basically Google pretends they don&#8217;t know who you are and forces you to open a regular gmail account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Egeland</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Egeland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>Great write up Gina but unlike you I&#039;m not as optimistic as you about Google Buzz. I really see this more as Google screaming out &quot;Look at us, we can do social too&quot; more than an actual attempt at getting into the social networking market. 

Google has failed with products in the past and I believe this may be another one of their product failures in the making.

If anyone is interested I outline why I think Google Buzz will fail here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://chadegeland.com/post/381186677/whats-all-the-buzz-about&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What&#039;s All The Buzz About?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up Gina but unlike you I&#8217;m not as optimistic as you about Google Buzz. I really see this more as Google screaming out &#8220;Look at us, we can do social too&#8221; more than an actual attempt at getting into the social networking market. </p>
<p>Google has failed with products in the past and I believe this may be another one of their product failures in the making.</p>
<p>If anyone is interested I outline why I think Google Buzz will fail here: <a href="http://chadegeland.com/post/381186677/whats-all-the-buzz-about" rel="nofollow">What&#8217;s All The Buzz About?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noelmcavoy</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>noelmcavoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I think Buzz has the potential to be a very valuable tool to me and many others. My biggest problem with keeping up with social sites etc is having to go back and forth between social apps, having a tool that integrates them all well (even if its only integrating the lowest common denominator ie status updates) will enhance my ability to participate in the online social communities regardless of which &#039;app&#039; they are using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Buzz has the potential to be a very valuable tool to me and many others. My biggest problem with keeping up with social sites etc is having to go back and forth between social apps, having a tool that integrates them all well (even if its only integrating the lowest common denominator ie status updates) will enhance my ability to participate in the online social communities regardless of which &#8216;app&#8217; they are using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: google.com/accounts/o8&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>google.com/accounts/o8&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>Similar to previous commenters (and in the vein of last weeks discussion on TWIG) I am having trouble accessing buzz using my main Google account, which is an apps account.

I have used it on an @gmail.com account and it seems to be pretty cool; however all of my email, contacts and my Android 1.6 phone are linked to my apps account.

I have managed to post a couple of Buzz updates from maps on the phone but without the Buzz folder in Gmail there is no way to fill in the profile details or link other account feeds (e.g. Twitter).

Also, the geo-location could do with a &quot;city level&quot; tuning knob like in Latitude, Brightkite, etc.  If I am sending a public buzz I don&#039;t really want to be giving out the GPS coordinates of my house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar to previous commenters (and in the vein of last weeks discussion on TWIG) I am having trouble accessing buzz using my main Google account, which is an apps account.</p>
<p>I have used it on an @gmail.com account and it seems to be pretty cool; however all of my email, contacts and my Android 1.6 phone are linked to my apps account.</p>
<p>I have managed to post a couple of Buzz updates from maps on the phone but without the Buzz folder in Gmail there is no way to fill in the profile details or link other account feeds (e.g. Twitter).</p>
<p>Also, the geo-location could do with a &#8220;city level&#8221; tuning knob like in Latitude, Brightkite, etc.  If I am sending a public buzz I don&#8217;t really want to be giving out the GPS coordinates of my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimmy</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>grimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>Correction to my previous comment:  Turns I can actually use it, but only from within Google Maps 4.0 (from the Market).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to my previous comment:  Turns I can actually use it, but only from within Google Maps 4.0 (from the Market).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimmy</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/5129/google-buzz-gmails-new-social-network-activity-aggregator#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>grimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=5129#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame it works on my Apple iPod Touch, but not on my Google Android Phone.  I have a HTC Magic which is only rocking Android 1.6 but it appears it only works in 2.0 and above...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame it works on my Apple iPod Touch, but not on my Google Android Phone.  I have a HTC Magic which is only rocking Android 1.6 but it appears it only works in 2.0 and above&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

