<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Versus China, According to Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smarterware.org/4589/google-versus-china-according-to-twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smarterware.org/4589/google-versus-china-according-to-twitter</link>
	<description>A blog about software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Abbott</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/4589/google-versus-china-according-to-twitter#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=4589#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not as skeptical @Dom. I have always held google in high esteem ever since they refused to release search data to the FBI after 9/11. They are protecting many of our consumer and privacy rights within the US and in the best sense possible promoting healthy dissemination of information globally. That&#039;s not to say their reasons aren&#039;t selfish. They are. But in this case, they&#039;re mutually beneficial to the rest of us. What&#039;s good for google is good for free-thinking society. You could even say google thrives because of a free-thinking society and, as such, may not have any business to do in China. Though I share your cyncism re: the business of PR, I see that as a necessary evil as well. You gotta put spin out there or someone else will do it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not as skeptical @Dom. I have always held google in high esteem ever since they refused to release search data to the FBI after 9/11. They are protecting many of our consumer and privacy rights within the US and in the best sense possible promoting healthy dissemination of information globally. That&#8217;s not to say their reasons aren&#8217;t selfish. They are. But in this case, they&#8217;re mutually beneficial to the rest of us. What&#8217;s good for google is good for free-thinking society. You could even say google thrives because of a free-thinking society and, as such, may not have any business to do in China. Though I share your cyncism re: the business of PR, I see that as a necessary evil as well. You gotta put spin out there or someone else will do it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/4589/google-versus-china-according-to-twitter#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=4589#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>I think these are all way off the mark. It&#039;s purely a business decision.

Google have been failing in China for some time and they want to get out. They&#039;re spinning a failed business as a positive human rights / anti-censorship move.

But if they really cared about censorship, they wouldn&#039;t have been in China in the first place. At least not on Chinese government terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these are all way off the mark. It&#8217;s purely a business decision.</p>
<p>Google have been failing in China for some time and they want to get out. They&#8217;re spinning a failed business as a positive human rights / anti-censorship move.</p>
<p>But if they really cared about censorship, they wouldn&#8217;t have been in China in the first place. At least not on Chinese government terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

