<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Edit Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia</link>
	<description>A blog about software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackenzie Morgan</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-998</guid>
		<description>So maybe men are more likely to respond to surveys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So maybe men are more likely to respond to surveys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-992</guid>
		<description>On blogs, at least, I&#039;d argue that there are more women blogging than men. I ran a survey of 1200 bloggers a couple of years ago, and that group turned out to be 65% female. The, incidentally, is true of the demographics of LiveJournal.

As for Flickr and other photo-sharing sites, my anecdotal experience is that there are roughly as many male or female users.

Now, of course, most of the most popular blogs are written by men. 

So I&#039;m not sure a gender bias in other kinds of content creation is a convincing or accurate explanation.

That said, I don&#039;t have a better one. The article&#039;s reasons feel pretty unconvincing, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On blogs, at least, I&#8217;d argue that there are more women blogging than men. I ran a survey of 1200 bloggers a couple of years ago, and that group turned out to be 65% female. The, incidentally, is true of the demographics of LiveJournal.</p>
<p>As for Flickr and other photo-sharing sites, my anecdotal experience is that there are roughly as many male or female users.</p>
<p>Now, of course, most of the most popular blogs are written by men. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not sure a gender bias in other kinds of content creation is a convincing or accurate explanation.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t have a better one. The article&#8217;s reasons feel pretty unconvincing, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Trapani</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-990</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true!!

I&#039;ve been thinking about how I felt about editing Wikipedia before I dove in--and that was uncertain and worried I&#039;d screw it up. I think that, in addition to the fact that wiki&#039;s are downright user-hostile (what with the markup, and in the case of Wikipedia, scary, multi-tiered community rules), is partially why these numbers are skewed. I mean jeez, it&#039;s not like women are a huge force in content creation in other areas of the web (blogs, photo-sharing, Twitter, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about how I felt about editing Wikipedia before I dove in&#8211;and that was uncertain and worried I&#8217;d screw it up. I think that, in addition to the fact that wiki&#8217;s are downright user-hostile (what with the markup, and in the case of Wikipedia, scary, multi-tiered community rules), is partially why these numbers are skewed. I mean jeez, it&#8217;s not like women are a huge force in content creation in other areas of the web (blogs, photo-sharing, Twitter, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisaleague</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>lisaleague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-989</guid>
		<description>OK, I guess while all the men are on Wikipedia, women will take over the world:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I guess while all the men are on Wikipedia, women will take over the world:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Trapani</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-988</guid>
		<description>@lisa: That number is based on a survey of 175,000 responses, a good-sized sample.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lisa: That number is based on a survey of 175,000 responses, a good-sized sample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisaleague</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>lisaleague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-987</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m female, have a Master&#039;s degree, and have edited entries before. But I never remember having to specify my sex while doing so. I enjoy that it is an open collaborative source. Of course I had the odd habit of reading the World Book when I was a kid....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m female, have a Master&#8217;s degree, and have edited entries before. But I never remember having to specify my sex while doing so. I enjoy that it is an open collaborative source. Of course I had the odd habit of reading the World Book when I was a kid&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Trapani</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Trapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-983</guid>
		<description>Ha! I guess I do! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I guess I do! <img src='http://smarterware.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanderleun</title>
		<link>http://smarterware.org/3147/how-to-edit-wikipedia#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>vanderleun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarterware.org/?p=3147#comment-982</guid>
		<description>Face it Gina, you edit like a girl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face it Gina, you edit like a girl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

